Common animals: beaver, raccoon, fish, turtle, crawdad, lots of birds e.g. Ducks, swallows, warblers, blackbirds, and lots more.
Common plants: Willow (Salix spp.), Sycamore (Platanus racemosa), Alder (Alnus spp.), Maple (Acer spp.), Ash (Fraxinus spp.) Cottonwood (Populus spp), Sedges (Carex spp.), Rushes (Juncus spp.), Cat-tales (Typha spp), Monkey flowers (Mimulus gutatus, M. cardinalis), Dogwood (Cornus spp.), Wild grape (Vitus spp)
Sitting here trying to delineate Valley Grassland, Freshwater Marsh and Riparian plant communities, I know how confused you are. Read early California history, and it doesn't help much. How to clarify?
I guess the best way is what the early explorers did (they didn't have the pollution and fecal contamination we do now, so don't do this.)
Freshwater marshes they called tulares or mires; they could not get their wagons (sometimes their horses), through them and the water tasted bad (anaerobic).
Riparian areas had good-tasting water (aerobic).
Salt marshes had brackish water with vegetation growing through it.
The riparian trees generally move water up into the plants on
the banks. We view lawns as riparian. The edges of the riparian areas
are where most the wonderful plants in cultivation came from. There's
enough water to carry
the relics from the California past. The burn and graze regime of the
1800's that has been used
against Californian chaparral doesn't work for riparian areas. The
wetter riparian areas
don't burn and rocky banks that are commonly next to a creek limit the
cattle from eating the plants.
In the San Joaquin Valley there were several plant communities: Freshwater Marshes, Seasonal Freshwater Marshes, Oak Woodland (mostly north of Visalia), Riparian Forests, Shadscale Scrub (mostly south of Coalinga), Grassland (mostly in the north where there are also boron problems) and Cactus Desert (southeast of Bakersfield, Edison to West Tehachapi and south to Mettler). In that order.
Many coastal towns had freshwater marshes that were filled in rather rapidly as the towns developed.
Now it would be wonderful to put back the marshes, but if you happen to live in one of those filled -in marshes I don't think you'd be happy. (Underwater houses have low property values.) But, if you do live in a former freshwater marsh, you can create a small pond, many birdbaths or some other water source and plant back some of the marsh plants.Humans have altered the habitat and replaced much of the lake side areas that had worms, grubs, fresh green stems and leaves for food and nesting. Fowl are left homeless and begging for food. If you can call white bread that people throw out for them food.
Sorry, can't go without making a comment about invasive alien plants. Riparian areas have abundant water, are often seasonally disturbed by moving water, and have lots of nutrients. This makes them great for weeds. It is also often hard to control them. Moving water helps spread seeds. And spraying herbicides in or near water is a really bad idea. ( Amphibians are super sensitive to surfactants and other things in the sprays). Anyway here are some bad weeds to be on the look out for: Tamarisk (Tamarix spp.), Giant Reed (Arundo donax), Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum),Cape ivy or German ivy (Senecio mikanioides), and unfortunately many many more.